Thursday, April 28, 2022

 03. Herzberg – Two factor theory



Kurt (2021) defines that Herzberg’s two-factor theory outlines that humans are motivated by two things: motivators and hygiene factors. Motivators encourage job satisfaction and hygiene factors prevent job dissatisfaction.

According to Herzberg cited in Ruthankoon, R. and Ogunlana, S.O., (2003.), motivation factors are the six ``job content'' factors that include achievement, recognition, work itself, responsibility, advancement, and possibility of growth. Hygiene factors are ``job context'' factors, which include company policy, supervision, relationship with supervisors, work conditions, relationship with peers, salary, personal life, relationship with subordinates, status, and job security.


Figure-1


(Source: Schermerhorn, et al., 2011)


Motivator Factors:

According to Herzberg cited in Nickerson.C (2021), these motivators are intrinsic to the job and lead to job satisfaction because they satisfy needs for growth and self-actualization.

According to Alshmemri, M., Shahwan-Akl, L. and Maude, P., (2017);

1.  Achievement: Positive achievement includes achieving a specific success, such as completing a difficult task on time, solving a job-related problem, or seeing positive results from one’s work. Negative achievement includes failure to make progress at work or poor job related decision making.

2.     Recognition: Positive recognition happens when employees receive praise or rewards for reaching specific goals at their job, or when they produce high quality work. While negative recognition at work includes criticism.

3.     Responsibility: This factor includes both responsibility and authority in relation to the job. Responsibility is related to gaining satisfaction from being given the responsibility and freedom to make decisions. Gaps between responsibility and authority negatively impact job satisfaction leading to dissatisfaction.

4.     The work itself: The actual content of job tasks and assignments has either a positive or a negative effect upon employees. Whether the job is too easy or too difficult, interesting or boring, can impact satisfaction or dissatisfaction of employees in the workplace.

5.   Advancement: Advancement is defined as the upward and positive status or position of the person or employee in the workplace. A negative or neutral status at work is considered negative advancement.

6.     Possibility for growth: Possibilities for growth are the actual opportunities for a person to experience personal growth and be promoted in the workplace. This allows for professional growth, increased chances to learn new skills, undergo training in new techniques and gaining new professional knowledge. 


Hygiene Factors

Hygiene factors are extrinsic to the job, and function in “the need to avoid unpleasantness” (Herzberg cited in Nickerson.C (2021).

According to Alshmemri, M., Shahwan-Akl, L. and Maude, P., (2017);

1.   Company policies and administration: This includes descriptions of adequate or inadequate company organization and management policies and guidelines. This factor involves good or poor organizational policies that affect the employee. For example, they may include a lack of delegation of authority, poor policies and procedures and poor communication.

2.       Working conditions: These factors involve the physical surroundings of the job, and whether there are good or poor facilities. Working conditions may include the amount of work, space, ventilation, tools, temperature and safety. A good environment, as opposed to a poor environment, makes employees satisfied and proud.

3.       Supervision: Supervision is associated with the competence or incompetence, and fairness or unfairness of the supervisor or supervision. This includes the supervisor’s willingness to delegate responsibility or to teach, fairness and job knowledge. A good supervisor, or access to supervision, is important to enhance the employee’s level of job satisfaction. Poor leadership or management may decrease the level of job satisfaction in the workplace.

4.       Salary: This includes all forms of compensation at one’s place of work, such as wage or salary increases, or unfulfilled expectations of wage or salary increases or decrease. Hospital policies should be clear regarding salary increases and bonuses in the workplace.

5.       Interpersonal relations: These relationships are limited to the personal and working relationships between the worker and her/his superiors, subordinates and peers. This includes job-related interactions and social discussions in the work environment and during break times.


According to Herzberg cited in Dartey-Baah, K. and Amoako, G.K., (2011), managers need to eliminate the dissatisfaction by doing the following;

v Fix poor and obstructive company policies.
v Provide effective, supportive and non-intrusive supervision.
v Create and support the culture of respect and dignity for all team members.
v Ensure that wages and salaries are competitive.
v Provide job security.
v Build job status by providing meaningful work for all positions.

·       Poor hygiene factors can cause job dissatisfaction, while better hygiene factors can reduce dissatisfaction but cannot cause job satisfaction (Herzberg et al. cited in Alshmemri 2017).

Motivation factors included achievement, recognition, the work itself, responsibility, advancement and the possibility for growth (Herzberg,1966; Herzberg, 2003 cited in Alshmemri 2017).


List of references:

  1. Alshmemri, M., Shahwan-Akl, L. and Maude, P., (2017). Herzberg’s two-factor theory. Life Science Journal, 14(5), pp.12-16.
  2. Dartey-Baah, K. and Amoako, G.K., (2011). Application of Frederick Herzberg’s Two-Factor theory in assessing and understanding employee motivation at work: a Ghanaian Perspective. European Journal of Business and Management, 3(9), pp.1-8.
  3. Herzberg, F., Mausner, B., & Snydermann B.(1959). The motivation to work. New York: Wiley.
  4. Herzberg, F.I. (1987), “One more time: How do you motivate employees?”, Harvard Business Review,Sep/Oct. 87, Vol. 65 Issue 5, p109-120.
  5. Herzberg, F. I. (1966). Work and the Nature of Man.
  6. Herzberg, F.I. (1968), ``One more time: how do you motivate employees?'',Harvard Business Review,January-February, Vol. 46, pp. 53-62.
  7.  Kurt.S (2021), Herzberg’s Motivation-Hygiene Theory: Two-factor. Available from: https://educationlibrary.org/herzbergs-motivation-hygiene-theory-two-factor/. (Accessed on 27th April 2022).
  8. Nickerson.C (2021), Herzberg’s Motivation Two-Factor Theory. Available from: https://www.simplypsychology.org/herzbergs-two-factor-theory.html (Accessed on: 27th April 2022).
  9. Ruthankoon, R. and Ogunlana, S.O., (2003). Testing Herzberg’s two‐factor theory in the Thai construction industry. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management.

12 comments:

  1. Whether working conditions has described as a hygiene factor in this theory, sometimes working condition has become more significant than motivator factors. Tan and Amna (2011) found that the element of working conditions is the most important factor for job satisfaction in the Malaysian retail sector. In addition, Ahmad (2008) found a link between favorable working conditions and motivation. Among other motivation and hygiene factors, respondents with professional degrees, bachelor's and master's degrees, PhDs, and certificate holders ranked the factor of working conditions as the most essential.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Herzberg cited in Sachau, D.A., (2007) stated that if managers enriched jobs, employees would be more interested in their work, they would exercise greater responsibility, and they would produce higher quality (not necessarily quantity) output.

      Delete
  2. Though Herzberg's two factor theory is still regarded as a useful tool in unraveling the enigma of employee motivation, there have been many (08) studies conducted which criticizes it's fit for use. A study on job satisfaction of 1,385 employees from different fields concluded that extrinsic motivators (hygiene factors) such as fair pay, working conditions and opportunities for growth are strong catalysts of job satisfaction with certain lower-level job roles - this contradicts with Herzberg's claim that hygiene factors do not trigger job satisfaction (Malik & Naeem, 2013).

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. According to Sachau, D.A., (2007) Herzberg proposed two psychological dimensions: “satisfaction–no satisfaction,” and “dissatisfaction–no dissatisfaction.” Further Herzberg argued that the motivator factors contribute to the experience of satisfaction–no satisfaction and the hygiene factors contribute to the experience of dissatisfaction–no dissatisfaction.

      Delete
  3. Rifky, If the management is interested in increasing the motivation of its employees, it should focus on the motivators or the intrinsic factors rather than the hygiene factors in the organization. (Allen,2008).

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Amal, following reference will be helpful to understand your comment. According to Stello, C.M., (2011) states that factors that affect job satisfaction are divided into two categories: 1. Hygiene factors surround the doing of the job. They include supervision, interpersonal relations, physical working conditions, salary, company policy and administration,benefits, and job security. 2. Motivation factors lead to positive job attitudes because they satisfy the need for self-actualization. Motivation factors are achievement, recognition, the work itself, responsibility, and advancement.

      Delete
  4. As per Alshmemri, Shahwan-Akl & Maude (2017) “The main concept of Herzberg’s theory is the difference between the two factors: motivation and hygiene. Motivation factors include achievement, recognition, the work itself, responsibility, advancement and the possibility for growth”.

    Alshmemri, M., Shahwan-Akl, L. and Maude, P. (2017). Herzberg’s two-factor theory. Life Science Journal, 14(5), pp.12-16.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Manual, to enhance your comment, Dartey-Baah, K. and Amoako, G.K., (2011) states that the hygiene factors when absent can lead to dissatisfaction in the work place but when fully catered for in the work environment on their own are not sufficient to satisfy workers whereas the motivators referring to the nature of the job, provide satisfaction and lead to higher motivation.

      Delete

  5. According to Ozsoy, (2019) Employee motivation is a major issue in management and organizational psychology research and Several motivational theories have been developed in this regard during the last 70 years . However, the universality of these motivating ideas is debatable and Herzberg's Two Factor Motivation Theory is one of these motivational theories. Ozsoy, (2019)
    Reference
    Ozsoy, E. (2019). An empirical test of Herzberg’s two-factor motivation theory. Marketing and Management of Innovations, 1(1), pp.11–20. doi:10.21272/mmi.2019.1-01.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. According to Herzberg cited in Dartey-Baah, K. and Amoako, G.K., (2011), the work one considers to be significant leads to satisfaction.

      Delete
  6. Adding to above, full supply of Hygiene Factors will not necessary result in employees’ job satisfaction. In order to increase employees’ performance or productivity, Motivation factors must be addressed (Wan et al, 2013).

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. when trying to improve a factor that effects job dissatisfaction, an extrinsic factor, such as the working conditions, this will not alter the employees perception of whether they are satisfied with their work; it will only prevent them from being dissatisfied (Schermerhorn cited in Riley, S., 2005).

      Delete